Sorry, but we all hate spam bots

Haven't registered Yet? Register Now.

X

Login

Forgot Password

Already a user? Login

X

Register On DiveAdvisor

i

Much like a facebook page - you need to first have a personal account through which you can login and manage the business page.

After creating a personal account, you will be directed to 'My Dive Shop' section where you can claim existing listing or create a new one.

Got It
i
i
By Using this Site I agree to the Terms & Conditons
Or Register With:
X

Hey there,

hopefully you are sufficiently intrigued with DiveAdvisor to become a member and see it in action


Much like a facebook page - you need to first have a personal account through which you can login and manage the business page.

After creating a personal account, you will be directed to 'My Dive Shop' section where you can claim existing listing or create a new one.

Got It


Or Register With:
By Using this Site I agree to the Terms & Conditons

Published
written by Susann Diercks
1

Does oxygen availability explain gigantism of polar marine animals?

Does oxygen availability explain gigantism of polar marine animals?

Chapelle and Peck (1999) have shown that gigantism is part of a trend to large size at low temperature and that this is
also associated with reduced salinities. Although the Maximum Potential Size (MPS) is mostly dependent on the
oxygen availability, rather than temperature or salinity. Chapelle and Peck (1999) indicated that the reduction in
metabolism with temperature and the carrying capacity of circulating haemolymph are not major factors. They found
that the availability of oxygen might not be the ultimate selective pressure towards the size of species, but it limits to
maximum size for the largest species (MPS).Their experiment showed that amphipod MPS and environmental oxygen
concentration are linearly related.
Verberk and Atkinson (2013) state that the availability of oxygen is lower in polar waters, irrespective of the greater
oxygen solubility. This is because the dependency of the oxygen partial pressure is described as being the main driver
for gas exchange, not the concentration (Spicer and Gaston, 1999). The effect of decreased oxygen diffusivity at cold
temperatures exceeds the solubility increase (Verberk et al., 2011) and leads therefore to a lower availability of oxygen
in polar regions.
Following the argumentation of Verberk and Atkinson (2013), the larger body size of polar organisms is a feature to
cope with the respiratory problems due to the higher viscosity of colder water. When animal are bigger, the thickness
of the boundary layer is reduced, thus the capacity for oxygen uptake is increased.

References


Chapelle G., Peck L., 1999, 'Polar gigantism dictated by oxygen availability', Nature, 399, 114-115 Devasagayam TPA, Tilak JC, Boloor KK, Sane Ketaki S, Ghaskadbi Saroj S, Lele RD, 'Free Radicals and Antioxidants in Human Health: Current Status and Future Prospects', Journal of Association of Physicians of India (JAPI), 2004, 52, 796

Fridovich I., 1998, 'Oxygen toxicity: A radical explanation', The Journal of Experimental Biology, 201, 1203 – 1209

McCord J., 2000, 'The Evolution of Free Radicals and Oxidative Stress', The American Journal of Medicine, 108, 652 - 659

Rahman K., 2007, 'Studies on free radicals, antioxidants, and co-factors', Clinical Interventions in Aging, 2

Spicer J., Gaston K., 1999, 'Amphipod gigantism dictated by oxygen availability?', Ecology Letters, 2, 397 – 403

Verberk W., Atkinson D., 2013, 'Why polar gigantism and Palaeozoic gigantism are not equivalent: effects of oxygen and
temperature on the body size of ectotherms', Functional Ecology, 27, 1275 – 1285

Verberk W., Bilton D., Calosi P., Spicer J., 2011, 'Oxygen supply in aquatic ectotherms: partial pressure and solubility together explain biodiversity and size patterns', Ecology, 92, 1565 - 1572

0




Load more comments